logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.09.19 2017고정1620
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On October 20, 2016, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and six months at the Seoul Central District Court on the charge of forging private documents, etc., and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 21, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. Forgery of private documents and the uttering of a falsified investigation document;

A. (State) On April 18, 2016, the Defendant conspired with C, D, and E for the purpose of uttering at the office of 309 office in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F Building, the representative director G without authority, prepared a proxy letter to the effect that G would delegate the establishment of a corporate account to the Defendant, and forged a letter of delegation in the name of (State) B of a private document on the rights and obligations of the said company’s seal imprinted in advance, and exercised it by presenting the forged proxy letter to the above employees of the said bank, who did not know the fact, when applying for the establishment of an account under the name of the said company at the new bank located at the new bank located at the new bank located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul.

B. (State) On April 26, 2016, the Defendant conspiredd with C, D, and E to make a proxy form to the effect that I, without authority, delegate the establishment of a corporate account to the Defendant at the office of No. 309 of the above F building, and forged a letter of delegation under the name of (State) H, a private document for rights and obligations on which I affixed the said company’s seal imprint, and exercised it by presenting it to the said bank employees who were unaware of the said company’s name while filing an application for the establishment of a corporate name in that he is a smart Qua in the vicinity of the Ho-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si (State ) with the intent to use it at the said office.

2. Violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act;

A. The Defendant, in collusion with C, D, and E on April 18, 2016, committed the following offenses: (a) cash cards, etc. related to the circulation of passbook in the name of ( State) B established at the new branch of the said bank as described in paragraph 1(a) at the new branch of the said bank; and (b) illegal gambling, Singing, etc.

arrow