The defendant shall be innocent.

1. Facts charged;

A. On October 8, 2015, the Defendant: (a) in collusion with D at the office of the law firm, a notary public of Seocho-gu Seoul, Seoul, requested D to prepare a promissory note process certificate in the name of E attached to each written agreement; (b) is attached to a promissory note prepared by D by removing the original copy of a certificate of seal impression in the name of E attached to the written agreement from the original copy of the written agreement; (c) D is “F Return” in the column for the addressee of the promissory note; (d) “F Return,” “I Representative Director J of the Ha of the Building of Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Seoul; and (d) “Seoul, Guro-gu, Seoul, KK L E” in the column for the drawer; and (e) continued to be used in the column for the authentication of a promissory note, “D/M 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200, 200,” respectively.

E’s seal has been affixed.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with D, forged a letter of promissory note 1 and a letter of delegation, which is a private document on rights and obligations, which is valuable securities, and exercised a forged promissory note and a letter of delegation as stated above, as if they were duly formed, to the employees of the said notarized office.

B. The Defendant and the aforesaid notary public, in collusion with D at the same time and place as above, presents forged promissory notes to N. an attorney in charge of notary public, who knows such fact, stated the fact of negligence in the original copy of the notarial deed (No. 281 of 2015).