logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2016.10.14 2016고정975
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On August 19, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for a term of fraud at the Ulsan District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 27, 2013.

On July 5, 2013, the Defendant posted a false letter, “Pop-up Pool 2” on the Internet NAVER website on July 5, 2013.

However, there was no intention or ability to sell the goods.

Nevertheless, if the defendant receives 140,000 won from a new bank account under the name A (C) to the victim B, he/she shall deliver the goods to the victim B, and he/she shall obtain pecuniary benefits equivalent to the above amount.

"2016 High Court 995"

1. On July 1, 2013, around 14:20 on July 1, 2013, the Defendant posted a letter to the effect that “The Defendant,” on the Internet NAVV online bulletin board of the U.S. A. C. C. C., who visited the Defendant, sold 120,000 won or more to the victim D, and said that “The Defendant will deliver them to the account transfer, on the one hand.”

However, even if the defendant receives money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the pressure foundation.

The defendant received 120,000 won from the victim's new bank account (C) in the name of the defendant on the same day, and deceiving the victim to receive property.

2. On July 5, 2013, the Defendant against the victim E posted a notice to the effect that “two copies of the right to freedom of park in the Internet Nuriland are sold” on the Internet Nurier's bulletin board in the Nam-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, U.S., and said, the Defendant said that “the victim E who contacted the Defendant will deposit KRW 50,00,000 to deposit KRW 50,000,000.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to sell the right to freedom of Ireland.

The defendant is the same day from the victim.

arrow