logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.05.20 2015고단695
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

From March 19, 2014, the Defendant, in collusion with E, an employee employee, received KRW 100,000 from F in return for sexual intercourse (so-called “sexual intercourse”) and provided guidance on the said F in return for sexual intercourse (so-called “so-called “com”), and introduced G, an employee of the sexual traffic.

Accordingly, the defendant conspireds with E to arrange commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant’s partial statement in court (the Defendant and his defense counsel merely run a marina business and did not engage in arranging sexual traffic for business purposes via E). The following circumstances acknowledged by each of the following evidence, i.e., the Defendant, as a person who operates a marina business in the name of “D”, appears to have been well aware of the current status of operation of the marina business establishment at least 2-3 times a week (E was well aware of the fact that the business establishment is working at the marina business establishment).

2) In full view of the following facts: (a) E’s “after entertainment” by a police officer who controlled or temperature the police officer, and the “services 30 minutes” by the police officer, and the “service 30 minutes” by the police officer were sent to the water, and received KRW 100,000 to the police officer, and provided information to the police officer by the room where female employees are employed; (b) G, a female employee of the said marina business establishment, is called “N” by the police officer’s “mar” in the water, and the “mixed Sea” by the police officer’s “N” in the water, and then sent out the mixed Sea, it can be sufficiently recognized that the Defendant conspired with E to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes; and (c) the Defendant’s assertion by the defense counsel is without merit).

1. Prosecutions and police interrogation protocol of E;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Recording and recording recording shall apply to the Acts and subordinate statutes.

arrow