1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

1. The reasons for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following additional judgments, and thus, they are cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Defendants asserts that the Plaintiff’s additional determination is unreasonable to recognize the disability rate due to spine damage as 23% (alley damage-V-A, occupational coefficient 5) based on the above disability diagnosis document, even if based on the disability diagnosis document issued by the G Hospital’s negoical surgery on August 12, 2015.

However, according to the results of the fact-finding on Gap evidence 10 and 11 and the head of H hospital: (1) E has undergone the 3rd MOI inspection on spine on October 8, 2014; (2) he/she has confirmed the escape certificate of the scopical scopical scopical scopical scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic s

Therefore, the defendants' assertion about disability rate due to spine damage is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate. Thus, all appeals by the Defendants are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.