1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

Attached Form

In relation to the insured events described in the 1st insured, the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant).

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "B" of Part 2, 2, 17, and 3 of Part 1, 2, 3, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5-D-1-b, 5, 5, 1 to 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 1 to 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 1, 5, 5, 1, 5, 4, 5, 5, 5, 1, 5, 5, 1, 5, 5, 1, 5, 5, 5, 5, 1, 6, 5, 1, 5, 1, 6, 1, 4, 20, 1, 6, 1, 4, 1, 20.

2. In the future medical expenses of No. 6th 1th 2th 2th 6th 6th 1th 6th 6th 2th 2th 6th 6th 6th 6th 2th 6th 6th 2th : as indicated in the column for the calculation of the amount of compensation for damages: The sum of the Defendant’s age, degree of negligence, injury and aftermath 4,738,747 won (i.e., property damage 10,78,747 10th 78,747, 1981, 2848196 1th 1986 1th 200 1th 200 2th 6th 6th 6th 6th 1st 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 1st 6th 200: The Defendant did not have any evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant actually spent the above expenses.