beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,634,476 as well as the annual rate of KRW 5% from May 17, 2012 to January 6, 2015 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
. The Defendant’s liability ratio is limited to 60% (Plaintiff’s negligence 40%) as such negligence is deemed to have caused the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damages.
2. Except as otherwise expressly stated below the scope of damages, all the entries in the attached Table of Calculation of Damages;
(Provided, That for the convenience of calculation, less than a month shall be included in the side on which the appraised value is low, the amount below the won shall be discarded, and the current calculation of the damages shall be based on the simple discount method which deducts the interim interest at the rate of 5/12 per month in the event of the accident of the damages, and it shall be rejected in which the parties' arguments are not presented).
Personal information 1) Personal data: as stated in the annexed sheet for calculating the amount of damages: 2) occupation and income: The maximum working age shall be calculated as urban daily wage as sought by the Plaintiff: 60 years old: 4); 1.71% (4% x 3/100 ± 7/100 ± 7/100 ± The appraisal rate is set off in the first decimal place; however, the disability rate is expressed in the second decimal place; 3) the maximum working age is calculated as urban daily wage: 1.60 years old; 5 years old; 5 years old; 1.71% (5% x 3/100 x 7/100); 3/100 of permanent disability x the appraisal rate is set off in the second decimal place; 4. The disability rate is set off in the third place below the decimal point
(2) (2) The admission period from May 17, 2012 to June 5, 2012: 10% (2) the number of 5 balance of 5 balance of 5 balance of 5 balance of 5: 0.86% (2%) : 0.86% (3/100 ± 7/100), 2.56% of the total disability rate: (1) the admission period from May 17, 2012 to June 7, 202: 10% (2) the operation date from June 6, 2012 to February 7, 2026: 2.1) the determination on the argument related to the labor disability loss rate (1) the plaintiff asserts that the occupational coefficient should be applied to the labor disability rate, in principle, the relevant indoor or outdoor disability rate is applied, and the plaintiff's assertion that he/she is engaged in the same part of 200 percentage of 2).