logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.11.19 2015고단1800
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Crimes related to the issuance and reissuance of one card;

A. On November 18, 2009, the Defendant: (a) neglected to arbitrarily issue a credit card in the name of D without obtaining D’s consent, which is a legal spouse, at the subordinate premises of the Hanam-si, the Hanam-dong, the Hanam-dong, the Hanam-dong, the Hanam-dong, the lower court held that the Defendant possessed the D’s resident registration certificate.

Accordingly, the Defendant, using a verification body, stated “resident number column”: E, name D, English name F, and home name address: 230 of the G building in South South Korea, one bank, account number: H, and forged an application form for membership in the name of D, signed and signed by the Defendant.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged the application form for membership of a card, which is a private document D, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

B. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) of Paragraph (1) of Article 1, exercised the card solicitor as if he were the document duly formed one card member application form, which was forged as above, with the card solicitor I.

C. The Defendant: (a) forged a credit card application at the time and place indicated in paragraph (1) above; (b) presented the credit card application along with D’s resident registration certificate; (c) took place as if he obtained D’s consent to the issuance of the credit card; and (d) deceiving one card solicitor belonging to one card.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was issued one card in the name of D around November 2009 by the victim.

2. Fraud related to the reissuance of foreign exchange cards;

A. On October 17, 2012, the Defendant applied for re-issuance of the D’s foreign exchange card, a legal spouse, by putting a phone on the victim’s foreign exchange card at the J Burial located in G building in the south-si, Gyeonggi-do.

However, the facts are that the defendant deducteds D the above foreign exchange card from D around November 2009.

arrow