A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 16, 2010, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) around 16, 2010, the Defendant entered “C” in the name column of the site where the registration form of a member of the cards was kept using a verification-type pen in the form of a lot, “D” in the resident registration number column; (b) “F” in the cell phone address column; (c) “F” in the cell phone column; (d) “F” in the cell phone column; and (d) “C” in the date of preparation; and (e) “C” in the applicant column at his own discretion on the side.

As a result, the Defendant forged one copy of the application form for membership of a card in the name of a private document C, which is a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

2. The Defendant at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) submitted one copy of the application form for membership of a registration card to G, who is aware of the forgery at the time and place specified in paragraph (1), as stated in paragraph (1), as if he/she were duly formed.

3. On April 14, 201, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) applied for the reissuance of a new card company’s nameless credit card in the call center without obtaining C’s permission from the Defendant’s house located at H in the Gwangju Metropolitan City Mine-gu; (b) and (c) arbitrarily inform C of C’s resident registration number when applying for the reissuance of a new card under C’s nameless credit card.

Accordingly, the defendant used another person's resident registration number unlawfully.

4. Fraud;

A. On July 25, 2010, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in Gwangju Metropolitan City Mine-gu, used the Defendant’s card under C’s name, which was issued by forging and exercising a membership application under the name of C, as stated in paragraphs (1) and (2), as if the Defendant had legitimate authority to use the card, the Defendant used the said card card to the staff in charge of home shopping in the aforesaid card chain store.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have legitimate authority to use the card.

Nevertheless, the defendant is a member store belonging to the same day.