logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1987. 10. 13. 선고 87누711 판결
[양도소득세부과처분취소][공1987.12.1.(813),1739]
Main Issues

The meaning of "the date of termination" as stipulated in the contract under Article 27 of the former Income Tax Act (amended by Act No. 3576 of Dec. 21, 1982)

Summary of Judgment

The term "date of exhaustion" in the contract prescribed in Article 27 of the former Income Tax Act (amended by Act No. 3576 of Dec. 21, 1982) is not only the date of determination of daily power, but it is also stipulated in the contract even if it is indefinite.

[Reference Provisions]

Article 27 of the former Income Tax Act (amended by Act No. 3576 of Dec. 21, 1982)

Reference Cases

Supreme Court Decision 83Nu729 Decided April 24, 1984, Supreme Court Decision 86Nu76 Decided September 9, 1986

Plaintiff, the deceased and the deceased

[Judgment of the court below]

Defendant-Appellee

Head of the Tax Office;

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 84Gu1037 delivered on June 18, 1987

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiff.

Reasons

We examine the grounds of appeal.

Article 27 of the former Income Tax Act (amended by Act No. 3576 of Dec. 21, 1982) provides that the date of transfer of assets shall be the date of receipt or receipt of part of the price other than the down payment, and the date of receipt or receipt of part of the price other than the down payment, such as intermediate payment and remainder payment, shall be the fixed date, if stipulated in the contract, and if the date is not stipulated in the contract, it shall be the 30th day from the contract date. The term "fixed date" mentioned in this provision means not only the fixed date but also the fixed date, but it is the opinion of the party member that the contract is stipulated in the contract even if it is indefinite, (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 86Nu76, Sept. 9, 1986; 83Nu729, Apr. 24, 1984). If the plaintiff received the land in this case as determined by the court below and the buyer and the purchaser newly constructed the contract on the same day, and it shall not be paid the down payment.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

Justices Park Jong-dong (Presiding Justice)

arrow