logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.06.14 2018고단1748
폭행
Text

Each public prosecution against the Defendants is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Defendant A and B are neighbors who reside in the same village.

Defendant

A around 12:00 on February 23, 2018, around the 12:00, when there was a dispute over the dual problem with the E residing in the back house of Gwangju-dong-gu, Gwangju-gu, he discovered that the appraisal of Defendant B was carried out from the house to carry out a campaign by Defendant B, and assault Defendant B, such as sprinking a flab, etc., and Defendant B committed an assault against this.

2. The facts charged against the Defendants may not be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act, as an offense falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act.

However, since the Defendants withdrawn their wish to punish the other party on May 29, 2018, which was after the indictment of this case, the Defendants dismissed their respective public prosecutions against the Defendants pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow