All prosecutions against the Defendants are dismissed.

1. Defendant B (52, 58, 000, 000) is a customer who found in the “C” restaurant operated by Defendant A (58, 00,000).

A. On May 21, 2017, Defendant A’s assaulted the victim “C” restaurant located in Da, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, with a view to calculating the food value even after the victim’s daily happiness and meals was completed, Defendant A’s assaulted, i.e., during a dispute, that the Defendant, who was aware of having failed to calculate the food value, demands the food value again, and that the Defendant used the victim’s scam with the hand floor to sclize her scam.

B. The Defendant, at the same time and place as “A”, committed the assault by Defendant B, at the same time and place as “A”, with the floor of the assault by the victim A, such as booming the victim’s back water, salkeing the breath, snicking the bomb

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260 (1) and (3) of the Criminal Act;

B. After the prosecution of this case, the victims expressed their intention not to punish the Defendants.

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;