beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B Co., Ltd., Defendant C, and Defendant D, each of whom was KRW 93,603,273, and their related thereto on December 28, 2013.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The Plaintiff is a person running E with the purpose of construction machinery leasing business, and on January 29, 2013, the Plaintiff is Defendant interesting Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant interesting Fire and Marine Insurance”).
Between the Plaintiff and the insured, the insurance period from January 29, 2013 to January 16, 2014, the amount of coverage is KRW 1,100,00,000, and the amount of coverage is determined as KRW 1,100,00,00,00. The maximum number of 300 tons of the booms owned by the Plaintiff (Liebr on January 1, 1991), 15.5 meters to 60 meters in length of the boom boom, and 300 tons of the boom boom, the mobile cl300 meters to 60 meters in length; hereinafter referred to as the “instant cler”).
(2) The construction machinery security agreement (hereinafter referred to as the “instant insurance contract”) to compensate for any damage, if it is necessary to repair or replace the damage due to a sudden and rapid damage, except the exemption from liability, during use in order to carry out this function.
(2) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) entered into a subcontract with I operated by Defendant C for the instant construction work, and appointed He as the head of the site office and the person in charge of safety and health management, by entering into a contract for the installation of PC boxes (hereinafter “instant construction work”) at the construction site of the construction site of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G District Urban Development Project Complex, the second section of the construction site of the construction site of the earth and sand ironworks, the second section of the construction site of the construction site of the construction site (hereinafter “instant construction site”).
3) Defendant C requested for equipment necessary for the instant construction to K, which is operated by Defendant D, and Defendant D, who did not have such equipment, set up and leased the instant crane at KRW 2.8 million per day from the Plaintiff. 4) Upon Defendant D’s request and on December 28, 2013, the Plaintiff used the instant tea to drive the instant tea at the instant construction site.