1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the following additional payments are ordered against Defendant B, Defendant C, and Defendant D.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a person running E with the purpose of construction machinery leasing business, and on January 29, 2013, the Plaintiff is Defendant interesting Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant interesting Fire and Marine Insurance”).

B) Between the Plaintiff and the insured, the insurance period from January 16, 2013 to January 16, 2014, the amount of coverage is set at KRW 1,100,000,000, and the amount of coverage is set at KRW 1,100,000,000, and the F-type mobile cranes owned by the Plaintiff (Liebherr on January 1, 1991), 300 tons of the maximum personal ability of 300 tons produced from Germany (Liebherr), 15.5 meters to 60 meters in length of boom boom, and hereinafter referred to as the “instant cler”).

[] A construction machinery security agreement (hereinafter “this case’s insurance contract”) which provides security for the damage in the event that it is necessary to repair or replace a sudden and rapid damage, excluding exemption damage, during use in order to carry out this function by the said buyer (hereinafter “instant insurance contract”).

A) The first contractor and the insured were S, the Plaintiff, but on May 2, 2013, as the ownership of the instant Red Cross transferred to the Plaintiff on May 2, 2013, the contractor and the insured of the instant insurance contract changed to the Plaintiff as above. (2) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) entered into a subcontract with Defendant C, the contractor and the insured of the instant insurance contract, on November 14, 2013. (3) Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant B”) entered into a construction site of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G District Urban Development Project Complex, Section 2 of the Seoul Metropolitan City Urban Development Project, Section 2 of the soil, steel, steel, and steel No, and steel No. 2 of the construction site (hereinafter “instant construction site”), and appointed H as the head of the site and the person in charge of safety and health management of the instant construction site, and appointed the PCP construction (hereinafter “instant construction”).

3 Defendant C requested K, operated by Defendant D, to provide equipment necessary for the instant construction, and Defendant D, who did not have such equipment, did not comply with the request from the Plaintiff.