logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.08.05 2020고단4437
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(알선수재)등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months;

2.Provided, That the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was working as a police officer for about 34 years and served as the head of the external cooperation team at a hospital located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government after retirement on June 2010.

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes;

A. A. Around September 2017, the Defendant: (a) received the request from D, a branch of the above hospital office, to the effect that “A, a branch of B, was accused of embezzlement and was investigated by embezzlement at the Suwon Police Station; (b) C is under detention; (c) upon receiving the request from the person in charge of the Suwon Police Station case, the Defendant: (d) “A person who is a branch of the above hospital, will be examined and resolved through a police officer, and will be seen at the above hospital office.”

Since then on December 2017, 2017, the first police officer called that the above D again saw the same request as the above, and that “in order to resolve the case, it is necessary to pay money because police officers have to talk with it even if they are drinking,” and received one million won from the above D in the account number (E) of one bank related to the resolution of the case from December 10, 2017.

As a result, the defendant received money and valuables for mediating matters pertaining to the duties of police officers.

B. The Defendant received F-related referrals from F who was introduced by D at the office of the above hospital on April 19, 200 to the effect that “The Defendant requested the police officer in charge of the instant case to make a well-resolution of the instant case by soliciting the police officer in charge of the instant case because he was investigated by a violation of the Credit Business Act at the Economic Team of the Seoul exists in the Seoul exists,” and that “the Defendant was also aware of the main office and police officers of the Gangnam Police Station prior to the internal time, and the police officers of the office and the police station.” The Defendant stated to the effect that “The Defendant would be able to resolve the instant case well through the police officer

On April 10, 2019, the Defendant issued KRW 2 million in cash from H coffee shop in Gangnam-gu Seoul (B Hospital) under the pretext of “to solicit the police officers involved in the case” from H coffee shop.

arrow