logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1993. 7. 27. 선고 93누1411 판결
[부가가치세부과처분취소][공1993.10.1.(953),2459]
Main Issues

The respective applicable provisions in cases where a special taxable person reports a value-added tax on a general taxable person without filing a tax waiver return and a general taxable person is converted to a special taxable person, but fails to receive the notice;

Summary of Judgment

Article 30(1) and (2) of the Value-Added Tax Act, Article 74-2(3) of the Enforcement Decree thereof provides that a special taxable person shall file a waiver of special taxation 10 days prior to the commencement of the taxable period in order to be subject to the provisions of the general taxable person without being subject to the provisions of the special taxable person, and that the special taxable person shall apply the special taxation at the time prescribed in Article 74-2(1) of the Enforcement Decree, regardless of the notification, in case where the general taxable person is converted to the special taxable person, regardless of the notification thereof. Thus, the application of the provisions of the special taxable person cannot be excluded, and the fact that the special taxable person filed a return of special taxation without filing a waiver of the special taxation,

[Reference Provisions]

Article 30 (1) and (2) of the Value-Added Tax Act, Articles 74-2 (1) and 74-2 (3) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act

Reference Cases

[Plaintiff-Appellant] Plaintiff 1 and 1 other (Law Firm Gyeong, Attorneys Lee Gyeong-soo et al., Counsel for plaintiff-appellant)

Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and appellant

Plaintiff (Appointed Party)

Defendant-Appellee

The Director of Incheon Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 92Gu14092 delivered on November 25, 1992

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be assessed against the plaintiff (appointed party).

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

Article 30(1) and (2) of the Value-Added Tax Act, Article 74-2(3) of the Enforcement Decree thereof provides that a special taxable person shall file a waiver of special taxation 10 days prior to the commencement of the taxable period in order to be subject to the provisions of the general taxable person without being subject to the provisions of the special taxable person, and that the special taxable person shall apply the special taxation at the time prescribed in Article 74-2(1) of the Enforcement Decree, regardless of the notification, in case where the general taxable person is converted to the special taxable person, regardless of the notification thereof. Thus, the application of the provisions of the special taxable person cannot be excluded, and the fact that the special taxable person filed a return of the special taxable person without filing a waiver of the special taxation is not converted to the special taxable person (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 90Nu4068, Sept

The judgment of the court below to the same purport is correct, and there is no error in the misapprehension of legal principles as pointed out in the theory of lawsuit.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Kim Jong-soo (Presiding Justice)

arrow