1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant Vietnam Co., Ltd. lost the amount exceeding the following order of payment.

1. The reasoning of this court concerning this part of the basic facts is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of the first instance, except in the following cases. Thus, the court's explanation is acceptable under the main sentence of Article 420 of the

C. From 6 up to 13 up to 16 pages are as follows.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 through 4, 6 through 9, 11, 12, and 13 (including each number, if any, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply)

(i) Each entry and the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. Expenses incurred in the occurrence of defects and repairing defects of the building of this case;

A. The reasons for this Court’s explanation concerning the cited part of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows. The Plaintiff’s argument is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance (section 8, No. 13, No. 15, No. 15, and the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance) except for addition of the judgment of the Plaintiff’s argument at the court of first instance

Part 9. The following shall be added to the table below:

The cost of repairing defects stated in the above schedule is the amount excluding design defects. As the latter, Defendant Vietnam Korea is liable for damages to the design defects of the item [public 199,216]. The cost of repairing the common use area including design defects is 339,378,230 won (public 199] (public 199),080,032 won [public 12,750,373 won]. The total cost of repairing the defect is 603,694,582 won (public 199), and the total cost of repairing the defect is 589,864,177 won [public 199] 1,080,737 won [public 12,750,373 won], and it is not an open parking lot under the above schedule [public 219,196 won], and it is not an open parking lot under the above schedule.

The relevant drainage channel part is to be constructed by an open siren on the inspection drawing of the building of this case and can be recognized as being actually constructed according to the drawing.