logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.11.10 2017나2033993
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff falling under the order of additional payment shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The reasons for this Court’s acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows: (a) the reasons for this case are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, (b) the same is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. The attached Form No. 15 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be replaced by the attached Form attached to this judgment.

o Part 8 of the first instance court's decision No. 4, "Expenses for repairing defects" is reversed as follows.

In addition to the purport of the argument in the first instance trial, in order to repair the defects of this case, it is recognized that the following expenses are necessary to secure the same amount as the indicated below on the premise that the parts subsequent to the rupture repair of outer walls are also to be removed. [unit 303,91,729 131,87,253 435,798,9824,908,095 40,707,077 75,2832,775,79,107328,69, 390, 390, 379, 3836, 384, 6864, 779, 479, 7579, 479, 7567, 479, 479, 757, 796, 779, 479, 757, 479, 7574, 7967, etc.

1. On the 12. on the 12. on the 46. on the ground of the Defendant’s argument, the construction of balconys, the floor waterproof construction of bathing rooms (e.g., omission of waterproofing construction, etc.) (122,723,251) electric oil; 12. on the 46. on the 46. on the 46. on the underground parking lot and its affiliated room wall (land adjoining to soil), the construction of waterproofing construction (e.g., omission of waterproofing construction) (e., omission of waterproofing construction).

arrow