logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.04.01 2015나2037212
손해배상(기) 등
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the part resulting from the appeal under Paragraph 2 below, and thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be dried;

A. Of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance court, the part regarding the “Defendant’s Housing Guarantee” is collectively considered as the “Defendant’s Housing and Urban Guarantee Corporation.”

B. Reasons of the judgment of the court of first instance

(a) 2) or 4 (2) or (4) (2) or (7) or 14 or 9 or 8 below the surface table) shall be dried as follows and added to 5) or 106. (2) or 106. (the number of items of defective in the appraisal report, hereinafter the same shall apply):

() The Plaintiff asserts that the defect repair cost of the above item is KRW 115,655,300, which applied the unit price of 12,500 square meters/land size as of 10m thickness of the above item. However, in full view of the purport of the pleadings as a result of the Supplementary Evaluation conducted on January 26, 2015, the Plaintiff asserted that the unit price of the instant apartment construction is KRW 4,000/m2 with a thickness of 10m, and the defect repair cost of this part is 37,009,69,696. This part of the Plaintiff’s assertion that the defect repair cost of the above item is 15,65,300, which is 100 won or more based on the thickness of 10m thickness of the above item. This part of the Plaintiff’s assertion is 37,500,000,0000,000 won or more of the above apartment construction, and the Plaintiff’s appraisal of this part of this case’s.

In full view of the results of the appraiser B’s appraisal and the results of each supplementary appraisal conducted on August 12, 2014 and December 2, 2014, the entire purport of the pleadings is as follows: (a) the approval drawings of the apartment of this case are constructed on the main and restaurant of each household.

arrow