The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of the facts charged in this case and the judgment of the court below

A. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case (1) in order to verify whether the requirements for wage and salary income, which is the conditions of occupancy of rental apartment, are the husband at the time, and whether or not the Defendant is the husband at the time, the Defendant entered “C” in the name column of “C”, “D”, and “C” in the resident registration number column, and “C” in the name of the person (taxpayer) who delegates the site for the issuance of a certificate of tax withholding for wage and salary income, which was kept in the Kim Jong-dong, Seo-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City around May 2009, and marked the above C’s seal held by the Defendant next to the name.

As a result, the Defendant forged a letter of delegation in C’s name, which is a private document on rights and obligations, for the purpose of uttering, and exercised the forged power of attorney as if it were a document duly formed.

(2) Around May 29, 2009, the proxy forgery and the defendant at this events made use of a type of written application for authorization for the change of the names of the E and F, who wanted to play “G” from their natives, and had the above C seal attached to the applicant’s legal representative’s registry by using the type of written application for authorization for the change of the names of the two copies kept there in the Changwon District Civil Service Office located in Sungwon-gu, Sungwon District Court, Sungwon-gu, Sungwon-si, Changwon-si, which had been located therein, and marked “C” in the column of the person with parental authority over the applicant’s legal representative, and affixed the above C seal attached to the name of the defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant, for the purpose of uttering, has forged two copies of an application for the permission of the opening of a name in the name of C, which is a private document with respect to rights and obligations, and, at the same time, has the original district court’s civil petition office, which knew of the forgery, as if the above completed the application for the permission of the opening of a name in the false name.