1. The Defendant’s disposition of revocation of the approval for modification of C Industrial Complex Plan, which was announced as B on December 29, 2017 by Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do.

2...

1. Circumstances of the public notification and disposition of this case

A. On December 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) on December 30, 2013, for the development project for the C Industrial Complex (hereinafter “instant project”); (b) as follows, the Cheongnam-do publicly announced the C Industrial Complex Plan as E (hereinafter “the first public notification”).

1. Name (title of business) of industrial complex: C industrial complex;

3. The location and area of an industrial complex (the location and area of the project implementation area): D office members per project owner.

4. Period and method of development of an industrial complex: Method of development from 2012 to 2015: Private development (SPC establishment);

5. The address of the operator of an industrial complex development project (the name of the project operator): The name of F at the official city: G representative director G.

B. From January 4, 2016 to December 29, 2017, the Defendant publicly announced the approval for modification of the C Industrial Complex Plan five times as indicated in the following table:

(hereinafter) The announcement of approval for change in entry 5 in the table below is hereinafter referred to as the “instant announcement”). The notification date of change in the development period of 1 I on January 4, 2016 (from 2012 to December 31, 2016) J 2 J 3K on December 13, 2016, 4 L L 3K on January 16, 2017 (from 2012 to December 31, 2017) for the development period of 5 B B on July 10, 2017, the revocation of the designation of a project operator on July 10, 2017 (including G Co.), and approval for change in the development period of 5 B on December 29, 2017 (from 2012 to 2019).

C. Meanwhile, the Plaintiffs are landowners of the land located in the instant business zone.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 4 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the public notice disposition of this case is legitimate

A. The instant notice disposition on the Plaintiffs’ assertion should be revoked on the following grounds.

1 The first public notice of this case is invalidated on December 31, 2015, and the subsequent public notice of this case is valid.