1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter referred to as the “ Intervenor”) is a person who has engaged in the production and supply of textile salting machine with the trade name “U” in Ansan-si S and T.

B. On March 8, 2016, an intervenor filed an application with the Defendant for approval of A general industrial complex plan. On April 21, 2017, the Defendant approved A general industrial complex plan (hereinafter “instant industrial complex plan”) pursuant to Article 15 of the former Act on Special Cases Concerning the Simplification of Authorization and Permission Procedures for Industrial Complexes (amended by Act No. 15678, Jun. 12, 2018; hereinafter “former Act on the Simplification of Procedures for Small and Medium Enterprises”) (hereinafter “instant prior disposition”), and publicly notified the same.

The main contents of the industrial complex plan of this case are as follows.

Name, location, and size of an industrial complex - Name: A general industrial complex - Location: Wilwon in Ansan-area: 78,000 square meters: The operator of an industrial complex development project: The period and method of development of the intervenor's industrial complex complex - the development period: the date of approval of the industrial complex plan to December 31, 2017 - the development method: the end-user development.

C. The Plaintiffs filed a multiple civil petition with the Defendant seeking the revocation of the instant prior disposition, as the owners of land where an industrial complex under the instant industrial complex plan is located.

As the Intervenor did not reach an agreement on land compensation with the Plaintiffs, on December 12, 2017, the Intervenor applied for a ruling of expropriation to the Gyeonggi-do Regional Land Tribunal on December 14, 2017, and on December 14, 2017, the Intervenor applied for a modified approval on the instant prior disposition requesting an extension of the development period based on Article 15 of the former Fire Services Act, on the ground that “the procedure of adjudication of expropriation, etc., and the air for the development project, such as securing ownership,

E. On April 18, 2018, the Defendant designated the project executor with respect to the instant industrial complex plan by the preceding disposition of this case to X, which was publicly notified at Ansan City, on the ground that the Intervenor did not comply with the conditions imposed at the time of designation or approval of the industrial complex.