1. The judgment of the first instance, including the counterclaim claim filed by the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) expanded and reduced in the court, is as follows.

1. Basic facts

A. On July 7, 2015, the Plaintiff obtained a building permit from the Kimhae-si market to newly build two household (five households) and non-Dong (6 households) multi-family houses (6 households) on the land (hereinafter “instant land”) located in the city of Kimhae-si (road name address: Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, and the following “instant land”) and started the said new construction work.

Defendant B 101 (25,00,000 20,000 20,000 202) 202,702,500 202,000 on January 20, 2016, Defendant C 2018 (20,000,000) 20,702,000 20,000 20,00 30,00 308,00 20,07 205,07,00 20,005,00 20,07,005,00 20,70,002,05,000 (including 24.99) 20,00,000,000 or more of 20,07,05,205,7,205,7,205,208,205,7,208,005,0

B. From August 2015 to January 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with the Defendants on each of the instant housing units listed below as listed in the following table, and the Defendants paid the Plaintiff each of the following amounts as part of the sales price.

C. On October 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendants agreed to perform the construction work directly and deducted the relevant construction cost from the sale price. The Plaintiff and the Defendants agreed to do so in the remote area, board, letter-to-door shot tree scam, and scam scam construction among the new construction of the instant housing construction work.

The Plaintiff completed the new construction of the instant house, and around March 14, 2016, from the Kimhae market.