logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2015.02.06 2014고단2020
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person who drives B wing-off cargo vehicles.

On September 8, 2014, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on September 20, 2014, and proceeded with the front road of the Jinsung-dong Jinsung at the time of leisure, which is the surface of the water-related small and medium village at the mouth of the river located at the mouth of the river at the time of leisure.

At the time, at night and at the front of the defendant's moving direction, the victim C's DNA franchise was stopped and the car was stopped, so the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent the accident by thoroughly manipulating the steering and brakes thoroughly and accurately manipulating the steering and brakes.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to discover the victim's vehicle without discovering the vehicle, and led the victim to the negligence in the course of duty, which led to the replacement of the front part of the above cargo vehicle, with the front part of the vehicle.

The Defendant got off a car by negligence in the course of business as above and damaged the car amounting to KRW 1,90,000 for repairing cost.

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement) by the Defendant was accompanied by a slope E belonging to the leisure police station and a F police box located in the wintering and landing of the said police station after receiving a report that the said accident occurred at the same time and at the same time as the above paragraph (1).

At around 21:00 on the same day, the Defendant refused to take a alcohol test for about 30 minutes from the above E, without justifiable grounds, on the grounds that there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was engaged in drinking, such as smelling, smelling, and snicking on the face.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of a freight truck B in salary class.

No owner of any motor vehicle shall operate any motor vehicle on a road that has not been covered by mandatory insurance.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not purchase mandatory insurance at the same time and place as the above paragraph (1).

arrow