logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2013.10.02 2012고단3592
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2012 Highest 3592"

1. A violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes), a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unclaimed Measures after Accidents), and the Defendant was engaged in driving of the Ccopi Do Do Track Road. On June 28, 2012, the Defendant driving the said cargo vehicle around the 22:10 on June 28, 2012, driving the Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do, and driving the front of the Do Do Do Do dong 2

In such cases, the defendant has a duty of care to prevent traffic accidents in advance by accurately operating the steering direction and brakes well-being and right and right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and right.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and changed the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the driving of the victim D (the 54 years old) who is proceeding two lanes due to the negligence of changing the two-lanes of the taxi, and received the gate portion after the left side of the taxi as the part above the right and right part of the above cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in light of the trend requiring treatment for about two weeks, and, at the same time, escaped without immediately stopping the vehicle and taking necessary measures, such as providing relief to the victim, even though the Defendant had the victim left the vehicle so that the repair cost would be equivalent to KRW 1,107,590.

2. The Defendant, who violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, did not purchase mandatory insurance, operated C Dok truck on the roads prior to the Dak-do Dak-dong 2, the Dok-dong 2, on the same date as that of paragraph (1).

"2013 Highest 1856"

1. On February 13, 2013, the Defendant, along with F, removed the victim H’s I building located in Y on February 13, 2013 around 04:00, and F, with pipe installed, removed the pipe lock door, and then removed six copies of the Stetra Lease Panel at the market price of the victim’s ownership, and the Defendant moved them to Libya.

arrow