A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a vehicle of salary class C by violating the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the Road Traffic Act, and the Road Traffic Act;

On June 15, 2014, at around 22:36, the Defendant driven the above cargo while under the influence of alcohol of 0.236%, and driven the front road of the National Bank in the water flow of Daegu hydro-gu, with the land, the distance from the water four-lane bank at a speed of about 50km per hour, depending on the two-lanes.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely operate by checking the right and the right and the right.

Nevertheless, as the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to do so, the Defendant was driven by the victim D(the age of 47) who was in the atmosphere of the signal at the front of the same room on the ground of negligence, and the part behind the rocketing car driven by the victim D(the age of 47) who was in the front of the said vehicle, and caused the shock to be driven by the victim F(the age of 51) who was in the front direction of the said vehicle, while the said rocketing car was pushed forward in the future, and the said part was driven by the victim F(the age of 51) who was in the front direction of the signal.

Ultimately, by occupational negligence, the victim H(37 years of age) who was on board the said BMW car suffered injury, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of wood, which requires two-day medical treatment, and injury to the victim I (40 years of age) of the bones of wood, tension, etc., which requires two-day medical treatment. At the same time, the above BM car was damaged to cover approximately KRW 1,692,90,00 for repair costs, such as the exchange of back bM car.

2. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is the owner of a C-wing cargo truck.

The Defendant operated the said cargo vehicle without purchasing mandatory insurance at the same time and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.Each police officer with F and D.