Defendant

A A Fine of KRW 4,00,000, KRW 1,500,000, KRW 1,500,000, KRW 300, KRW 1,000, KRW 1,000, KRW 1,000.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A was elected in the first half of the 2016 presidential election (I election district) implemented G to be a candidate for the J Party (official in charge of accounting) in the first half of the 2016 presidential election (I election district), and Defendant B was the relative of Defendant A.

Defendant

C as the friendship of Defendant A, who operates the “L cafeteria” in K, and Defendant D is a person who operates the “N cafeteria” in M.

1. Except for the cases where allowances, actual expenses, and other benefits are provided under the Act on the Election of Public Officials Related to Election Campaign, no one shall offer, express an intention to offer, or request, or receive money, goods, or other benefits in connection with the election campaign, regardless of the pretext thereof, such as allowances, actual expenses, and other compensation for volunteer service;

A. The Defendants’ joint crime Defendant A, while attending the election in the vicinity of P on March 31, 2016 at around 10:00, was committed by Defendant B and the election campaign period (from March 31, 2016 to April 12, 2016). Defendant B, while talking about the issue of an occupation-oriented intention of election clerks, was to buy her feded by friendly C.

On the other hand, it is possible to bring about to the election officer.

It is said that the thesis to be solved by ascertaining the fact that in the election campaign period, it is within the election campaign, it is difficult to carry out the election campaign, and the defendant A will do so.

The term “conscising Defendant A’s election campaign members to provide brailler with information about election campaign.”

(1) Defendant A, B, and C’s joint crimes, and Defendant B thereafter, around March 31, 2016, would cause Defendant C to drink “A candidate election campaignmen and bring about an increase in the number of times.”

Defendant C conspiredd to provide brailles in connection with election campaigns to the election clerks of Defendant A by stating “L cafeteria.”

Accordingly, on March 31, 2016, Defendant C bears the responsibility of Defendant B at the “L cafeteria” restaurant operated by Defendant C at around 12:00.