1. The Defendant calculated 20 million won to the Plaintiff at the rate of 20% per annum from October 8, 2014 to the date of full payment.

1. According to the purport of each of the statements and arguments as to Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2 and all of the arguments, it is recognized that the plaintiff issued a promissory note to the defendant on October 11, 2013 with a face value of 200 million won and a face value of 200 million won, and the due date for payment. Thus, the defendant should pay the above promissory note amount to the plaintiff, unless

Although the defendant asserts that the plaintiff issued the above bill of exchange with the promise to keep it without legal validity, there is no evidence to acknowledge it otherwise, the above argument is without merit.

Therefore, the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay calculated at the rate of 20% per annum from October 8, 2014 to the date of full payment, which is clear that the above 200 million won and the copy of the complaint of this case were served on the Defendant.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is reasonable and acceptable.