logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 12. 01. 선고 2016두48638 판결
(심리불속행)사실과 다른 세금계산서 수취로 선의무과실에 해당하지 아니하나 부당과소가산세 대상 아님[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court-2016-Nu-10785 ( July 21, 2016)

Title

(C) If a taxpayer does not receive a tax invoice from another party but does not fall under the fault of duty of good faith, it shall not be subject to unfair and minor tax.

Summary

It is difficult to view that the substance of the tax invoice different from the original tax invoice was received and fulfilled the duty of care. However, the actual supplier who supplied the scrap metal is subject to the imposition of additional tax for lack of evidence, as a business operator under Article 2 of the former Value-Added Tax Act.

Related statutes

Article 21 of the Value-Added Tax Act

Cases

Supreme Court-2016-Du-48638 ( December 1, 2016)

Plaintiff-Appellant

AA Corporation

Defendant-Appellee

○ ○ Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Daejeon High Court Decision 2016Nu10785 Decided July 21, 2016

Imposition of Judgment

December 01, 201

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against each appellant.

Reasons

Examining the lower judgment and the grounds of appeal, the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds of each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal, or are deemed to fall under each subparagraph of paragraph (3). Therefore, all appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow