Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, as to the Defendants, the period of one year from the day when this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. Around November 2016, the Defendant found one set of two-wheeled automobile number plates owned by the victim D, who was far away from the main gate of the Geumcheon-gu Busan Metropolitan Government C building.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim and embezzled the property as he had on his own mind.

B. On March 10, 2017, the Defendant illegally used air defense, at around 10:00, ordered B to operate the Oralb by attaching the number plate of the two-wheeled automobile, which was acquired in front of the Geum-gu, Busan, Geum-gu, Busan, and on the street, at around 10:0, the number plate of the two-wheeled automobile, which was acquired as above, on the street.

Accordingly, the defendant used the official symbol unlawfully for the purpose of exercising it.

2. Defendant B, around 10:00 on March 22, 2017, operated Defendant B, in front of the F of the Geum-gu, Busan, U.S. F, the number plate of the “E” was attached, and Defendant B, operated his large-scale stezine.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised the illegally used air defense.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records;

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) Defendant A: Article 360(1) of the Criminal Act (a) (the embezzlement of possession and the selection of imprisonment) and Article 238(1) of the Criminal Act (the unlawful use of public symbols);

B. Defendant B: Article 238(2) and Article 238(1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of an unlawful air defense event)

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes (defendant A), the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentence as ordered is imposed in consideration of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendants’ grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are against the Defendants; (b) there is no record of the commission of a crime that may be considered to the Defendants; and (c) the Defendants’ age, sex, criminal conduct, environment, family relationship, motive and consequence of the commission of a crime; and (d) the motive and consequence of the commission of a crime; and (e) the