A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 2017, the Defendant: (a) found a victim D’s number plate (E) that was stolen, around July 2012, at an influent place located in C at the time of a grace period of around 22:00.

Defendant 1 did not take necessary procedures such as returning the above acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

2. On March 2017, the Defendant illegally used air defense, attached the “E”, as described in paragraph 1, to the Defendant’s office, attached the number plate to the Defendant’s office, for the purpose of exercising the number plate.

Accordingly, the defendant used the official symbol for the purpose of exercising the right.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, posted “E” No. 2 on the Defendant’s Obaba, and operated the Defendant’s Obaba, which attached another Obaba registry number plate from that time to April 25, 2017.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised the illegally used air defense.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. A detailed statement of stolen and stolen vehicles;

1. Investigation report (Attachment of seizure number plates, photographs of the suspect and photographs attached to the suspect's ozone);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of Oral dyphograph photographs and Oral dyphograph photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 360(1) of the Criminal Act that provides for the choice of punishment (the embezzlement of deserted articles in possession, the choice of imprisonment), Article 238(1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of unlawful use of public marks) and Article 238(2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (the occupation of an event for the prevention of unlawful use air);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is that the defendant is against the recognition of the crime of this case, and that there is no record of criminal punishment.