logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 홍성지원 2019.02.12 2018고단713
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A The written indictment from March 2, 2018 states that “from November 2017,” but this is based on the police interrogation protocol and the non-control report with respect to Defendant A who has no admissibility of evidence. As such, it is corrected as above at the time of the contract that Defendant A agreed to lease the said D shop from Defendant B.

A person operating the “D” located in Chungcheongnam-gun budget group C (hereinafter “instant establishment”), and Defendant B is the owner of the building in which the said “D” is located (hereinafter “instant building”).

1. The Defendant: (a) from March 2, 2018 to July 23, 2018, up to 2018, the Defendant provided four smuggling in which intrusion was installed in the said “D; (b) two shower rooms; (c) employed female employees E (V) and received KRW 110,00 won as the price for sexual traffic from customers visiting the said establishment; and (d) had female employees do sexual intercourse with the said customers.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging commercial sex acts.

2. Defendant B, around February 16, 2017, knew of the fact that the said “D” was controlled and investigated by the brokerage of commercial sex acts, the said “D” was acting as an intermediary for commercial sex acts, such as arranging commercial sex acts. On March 2, 2018, Defendant B entered into a lease agreement with the said “D” store and provided a place for commercial sex acts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Photographs of the business place;

1. Determination as to the assertion of the Defendant A and the defense counsel in the real estate lease agreement, transfer documents, and the defendant

1. The summary of the assertion is that the Defendant provided legitimate marina services at the instant establishment and received the payment for that services, and does not arrange commercial sex acts.

2. The following circumstances found based on the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, namely, F police officers in charge of G in the budget police station.

arrow