logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.11.30 2016고단1822
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and fines for 10,000,000 won, and Defendant B shall be punished by fines for 3,000,000 won, respectively.

The Defendants are the defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a business owner running a commercial sex trafficking business from December 7, 2015 to April 7, 2016, with the trade name of “D” from 5 and 6th floor of the building C located in Daegu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, to 5 and 6th floor.

On April 7, 2016, at around 23:20, the Defendant: (a) received 1.80,000 won in compensation for sexual traffic from the police officer who pretended to lose female descendants; (b) provided guidance to the inside room where female employees E are waiting to engage in sexual traffic to arrange sexual traffic; and (c) provided employment of female employees from around December 7, 2015 to April 7, 2016, and arranged sexual traffic by having them engage in sexual traffic to receive 180,000 won from an unspecified number of men who had found the said business place from around December 7, 2015 and receive 1.80,00 won in compensation for sexual traffic.

2. Defendant B, who is an employee in charge of the carter of the said “D” business, received 180,000 won from a police officer who pretended to have lost male descendants for sexual traffic at around April 7, 2016, and arranged sexual traffic by guiding a female employee E to a room waiting for sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the report on the occurrence, temporary inspection, internal investigation, and business concern photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (referring to the generality, the choice of imprisonment, and the concurrent imposition of fines under Article 24 of the same Act): Defendant B: Article 19 (1) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The act of arranging sexual traffic for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act requires severe punishment for crimes with great social harm, such as by commercializing sex and impairing sound sexual culture.

Defendant

A shall be reasonable.

arrow