1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 18, 1997, the Plaintiff entered the Army as a private soldier and was dismissed on October 1, 1998, and was discharged from active service on May 31, 2012. After being discharged from active service on May 31, 2012, the Plaintiff’s implementation of physical training, such as serious personnel and rapid military personnel, as part of the preparation of an association harsh training on December 201, 201 when he/she was in office as a B’s commander.

Embrying and observing pains on Bag and Magy;

On January 13, 201, 201, at the National Armed Forces Waterworks Hospital, the results of the MRI shooting conducted on January 13, 201 and the same year after being diagnosed on the front of the light signboards No. 4,5,6

8. On February 1, 2016, asserting that he/she received surgery on December 22, 201, and was discharged from the military service on May 31, 2012, he/she filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State with the “Plag escape certificate, light signboard board” (hereinafter “instant difference”). (b) However, the Veterans Review Board’s “the military special character related to the military service is not verified, and it is confirmed that he/she will suffer a fall in the emulation of emulation and disc signal strength, meaning a change in the emulation.”

It is necessary to determine whether the existing disease has deteriorated due to medical opinions, such as non-annual blood, side species, and damage to the organization, if the external trauma is not proven. It is not determined that the aggravation of the existing disease does not correspond to the requirements of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State, but is rapidly aggravated at a level above the natural progress speed.

The Defendant, upon deliberation and resolution, rendered a judgment on May 23, 2016 on the following: (a) “Guidance for the results of the registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”); and (b) the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal, but was dismissed on February 14, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, Eul evidence 1 to 12, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff asserted that the plaintiff was treated at the National Armed Forces Hospital around December 19, 2005, because the abortion was not properly conducted at the time of the operation of the Special Headquarters around May 2004 at the time of the operation of the Special Headquarters, and the plaintiff was frighted as the head of the Gun, and was frighted at the National Armed Forces Waterworks Hospital around December 19, 2005.