beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's main claim is dismissed.
2. The Defendant’s person eligible for veteran’s compensation against the Plaintiff on June 22, 2015.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On September 16, 2010, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on December 31, 2014, when the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on December 31, 2014.
B. On February 6, 2015, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the following grounds: “On November 30, 2012, the Plaintiff was injured during the Bocheon-gun’s night-time session” and “G3-L4-5-S1” (hereinafter “the difference in this case”) as the difference in the Plaintiff’s application for registration, namely, “protruding-out” or “protruding-out” in the medical opinion against the Plaintiff, etc. (hereinafter “the difference in this case”) was also the difference in the Plaintiff’s application.
C. On August 4, 2015, the Board of Patriots and Veterans Entitlement: (a) went beyond vadididi, without any external wound (e.g., front-down of vehicles, fall, etc.); (b) there was no proof of medical opinions of “vertebrate” that can recognize that post-sign escape was caused by acute urgency; (c) the application portion L3-4, L5-S1 was performed only for preserved treatment without special treatment, such as surgery; (d) L4-5 parts were confirmed in the process of surgery, but did not present an opinion of “fluor, glass movement” that can recognize considerable aggravation with the opinion of “fluoric escape”; and (e) the typical e.g., the typical e., the performance of duties or education and training was presented, and do not constitute the requirements for deliberation and resolution on persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State.
Based on this, on June 22, 2015, the Defendant rendered a “decision that is not equivalent to the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation”
Each of the above two dispositions are classified as "a non-specific decision of the person who rendered distinguished service to the State in this case," "a non-specific decision of the person eligible for veteran's compensation in this case," and "the above two dispositions are all taken."