1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff is appointed as a civilian military employee on October 1, 1979 and served as the plaintiff.

On December 31, 1998, the retirement was made.

B. On September 4, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished service to the Defendant on the ground that “a person was subject to voluntary retirement due to an excessive burden on Huuri, while transporting heavier things, such as the capture during the employment of civilian employees in the military service, and received surgery treatment by using Huuri disc, disc, and so on.” However, on April 3, 2014, the Plaintiff was subject to a disposition by the Defendant on the ground that “a person who has rendered distinguished service to the State and a person eligible for veteran’s compensation was exempted

C. On June 15, 2016, the Plaintiff again filed an application for registration of persons of distinguished service to the Defendant on the ground that “A civilian military employee had no health disorder at the time of being appointed as a civilian military employee,” and repeated maintenance work, such as celebs, etc. after being appointed as a civilian military employee, and repeated the management work, such as celebsium, had been created, had been given medical treatment from around 1985 to Byung and received medical treatment at a private hospital, and voluntarily retired from post, and then, he/she received invertecopty chrons (C-4, No. 4-5, No. 3-4, No. 4-5, No. 5, No. 5, No. 1,000 (hereinafter “the instant case”).

Therefore, the Defendant did not determine that the instant difference occurred as a direct cause for the performance of duties or education and training directly related to national security, national security, or the protection of citizens’ lives and property, and thus, did not constitute the requirements of public officials on official duties. Therefore, it is not determined that the performance of duties or education and training directly related to national security, national security, or the protection of citizens’ lives and property, and that the performance of duties or education and training has been rapidly aggravated at a speed above nature as they directly caused the ever-ever progress speed. However, it is not determined that the occurrence of the occupational duties or education and training, which are not directly related to national security, national security, and the protection of citizens’ lives and property, has been rapidly aggravated