1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 24, 2011, the Plaintiff entered the Army and was discharged from military service on May 2, 2012.

B. On October 29, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who has rendered distinguished services to the State with respect to “vertebrate sofack-in verteck-in verteck-in verteck-in verteck-in verteback-in verteck-in verteck-in verteck-in verteck-in verteck-in verteck-in knick-in, etc.” claiming that

C. In other words, on April 16, 2013, the Plaintiff applied for re-registration of persons who rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that “the 4-5 conical signboard escape certificate, and spine vertebrate copire certificate” was different. D.

On October 22, 2013, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition that determined that the Plaintiff did not meet the requirements for persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State or persons eligible for veteran’s compensation and notified that the injury was caused by the failure to verify the characteristics related to military duties on the part of the Plaintiff’s necessity, and that the injury caused by the direct cause of performance of duties or education and training, which led to the aggravation

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 2-1 and Eul evidence 2

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's assertion was made that the plaintiff's 4-5 conical disease occurred on the 4-5 conical signboard, but the remaining disposition of this case which did not recognize it is unlawful since the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff's 4-5 conical disease rapidly aggravated beyond nature, such as the complete military head of the army in the new illness education and training, the operation of cutting down the entire fluor group, the work of cutting up the soil, and the detention of 30 days from the hold, etc.

B. The above evidence and Eul's statement 3-1 and 2-2, and the court's entrustment of appraisal to the Korean Medical Association is all the arguments.