A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and ten months.

The seized vehicle number plate (C) 1 (No. 23) shall be returned to the victim D.

Punishment of the crime

On June 30, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective crime, deadly weapons, etc.) in the Changwon District Court's Msan Branch, and completed the execution of the said punishment on December 26, 2012.

1. The Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (thief) committed a theft with one LG mobilephone at the market price equivalent to KRW 70,00,00,000 in front of the Fmat in Sacheon-si E around August 2013.

From the beginning of August 2013 to April 17, 2014, the Defendant habitually stolen property worth KRW 15,810,000, total market price from many victims on 33 occasions, as stated in the attached Table of Crimes List, from August 2013 to the beginning of April 17, 2014.

2. Fraud and violation of the Specialized Credit Finance Business Act;

A. On April 15, 2014, around 18:41, 2014, the Defendant settled the price with a stolen H’s new card, as shown in paragraph (1), and used a stolen credit card, as if the Defendant had legitimate authority to use the purchase of at least KRW 84,00,00 from the LG Electronic Complex Sales Site (ju) in the city of Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si.

B. Around April 16, 2014, the Defendant settled the price with the H’s new card that was stolen as set forth in paragraph (1) No. 32 of the crime committed on April 16, 2014 and used a stolen credit card, as the Defendant had legitimate authority to use the 10 percent of the 10 percent of the 10 percent of the 280,000 won of the 280,000, at the J upper conference located in Sacheon-si I, Sacheon-si.

C. Around April 17, 2014, the Defendant, on April 17, 201, purchased KRW 50,000 tobacco at L convenience stores located in Sacheon-si (Sacheon-si) around 03:28 on April 17, 2014, and acquired pecuniary benefits equivalent to the same amount by settling the price with M’s bar card that was stolen, as shown in paragraph (1) of this Article, as if he had legitimate authority to use it.