logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.03.30 2016고정1138
공용물건손상등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 31, 2016, around 00:35, the Defendant reported to E (65) the game room business owner E (65) on “not having demanded refund of KRW 112,000,000,000..........” On the ground that the Defendant did not receive money from the police officer G (51) who belongs to the F District Unit of the Police Station in the Dong-dong Police Station in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju, for the reason that the Defendant reported to E (65) the game room business owner, “not having demanded refund of KRW 0,000,000.........., the Defendant did not receive money from the police officer “........, the police officer

J. S.D. L.S.C.;

The victim publicly insultingd the victim by openly speaking as "I am, saves, saves, and saves, I am, I am."

2. Whether the Defendant, in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act from 00:40 to 01:30 on the same day as the entry in paragraph (1) of this Article, was arrested and carried out in flagrant offenders on the ground that he took a bath like the entry in paragraph (1) of this Article, and that he was arrested in flagrant offenders on the ground that he took a bath as described in paragraph (1) of this Article, and that he was under the influence of alcohol, “Isson’s mistake;

Is the reporter’s fault;

Then, I tried to look back to toilets by pointing out this blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blick blicks in the waiting room of the defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

3. The Defendant damaged goods for public use at the time, time, and place specified in paragraph 2, by asking Handphones, which are public goods used in the said district for the act of revocation, as described in paragraph 2 above, and thereby damaging goods used by the public offices by debrising the Handphones, which are public goods used in the said district, so that the market value of the repair cost would be 101,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of a witness G, I, E, and J;

1. A complaint filed for G production;

1. A letter of arrest of a flagrant offender;

1. The circumstantial records of the State;

arrow