logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.06.17 2016고단690
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On the front side of the “D” hospital located in Jeju on March 11, 2016, the Defendant, who obstructed the performance of official duties, was dissatisfied with the fact that the Defendant driving of the E-high-speed passenger vehicle in drinking conditions, and the police officer G, a police officer belonging to the police station of the Jeju East Police Station, and the police officer assigned to the police station of the Jeju East Police Station, and the Defendant was dissatisfied with the fact that the Defendant controlled the H., and the police officer “N. P.N.P.”

In carrying out a hacker’s bath, the part of the right string of the border G was walking once by a string door, and the knicked the knick’s knick on the right side of H with his hand, and the knicked the knick on his hand.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the above police officers and interfered with their legitimate execution of duties concerning the crackdown on drinking driving and criminal investigations.

2. On March 11, 2016, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) was arrested in flagrant offender due to the crime obstructing the performance of official duties at the police station located in Jeju-dong Police Station located in I on March 22:30, 2016; and (b) the Defendant was arrested in flagrant offender due to the crime obstructing the performance of official duties and was transferred to the said district; and (c) the police officers who had been serving in the said district unit “Ig, Igk kbp

“......” and “.............................”

The mobile phone in possession of “this Chewing sarbro” was on the floor of the sark office.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, had a very rough and disorderly speech and behavior in a public office.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made with respect to G and H;

1. Written statements prepared by the J;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of disturbing the revocation of the week in the official document), and the choice of fines;

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) and (2), and Article 50 of the Criminal Act (within the scope of the long-term sum of the punishments of two crimes);

1. Attraction of a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2)1 of the Criminal Act;

arrow