Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 14, 2017, from around 01:00 to around 02:35 of the same day, the Defendant: (a) under the influence of alcohol from the main point of “D” operated by the victim C in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-do, the Defendant: (b) expressed the victim and his employees of the said main point “Is to drink, drink, Is, Is, and son equal to the bit of bitch bitch bitch,” thereby obstructing the victim’s main business by forcing other customers to go at the said main point, thereby obstructing the victim’s main business by force.

2. The Defendant is urged by the victim F and the victim G, who are police officers belonging to the G police station E zone of Gwangju police station, called after receiving a 112 report, to calculate the drinking value and return home from the victim F and the victim G, and the employees of the above C and the above station are heard at the time and place referred to in the above paragraph (1).

10 U.S.C. 18 U.S.C. 18

C. Eargue A, whose internal value is calculated, or whose value is not calculated, is also the chief of the police station, N.N. N. N.N.

Whether or not they are in this case

The term “public interest” refers to a large interest rate, and the victims were openly insulting.

3. On April 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 03:20, at the Seoul Special Police Station E District located in Gwangju Special Metropolitan City, Gwangju Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (b) expressed that he was able to smoke from G when he was arrested and carried in a flagrant offender on the grounds of the aforementioned paragraphs 1 and 2; (c) the Defendant: (d) expressed that he was able to smoke; (d) the said G was able to take a bath to “undertake down only the width; (d) the ring of such weather; (e) the ring of such weather; (e) the ring of such weather; and (e) the ring of the brub used in his hand to the said G; and (e) attempted to see the boom.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of G flagrant offender who is a police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A written statement of C, I, and J;

1. Each complaint;

1. Application of two video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;