(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.10.10 2014고정2863

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.10.10 2014고정2863

사문서위조등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 8, 2012, the Defendant forged private document: (a) without authority to use a notary public in preparing a notarial deed of a monetary loan contract in the name of Da in the name of Da Law Firm Office, the Defendant entered “D and Incheon Southern-gu E apartment 711-202,” in the column of a proxy form stating that “a notary public who designates A as his/her agent and entrusts a notary public with the preparation of a notarial deed of a monetary loan loan contract in the name of Da Law Firm Office,” and affixed a seal imprint of D’s seal impression brought to D next to D’s name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged a letter of delegation in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant exercised a forged private document by delivering the power of attorney-at-law in charge of authentication, a notary public, to the F who knows that it was forged, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1.

3. Notwithstanding the fact that the Defendant did not borrow money from H at the time, place, and the fact that the Defendant borrowed money from D, and the Defendant did not have been entrusted with the preparation of a notarial deed under a monetary loan agreement, as stated in paragraph (1), the Defendant issued to the notary public attorney-at-law in charge of authentication as stated in paragraph (2) the power of attorney-at-law in charge of authentication as stated in paragraph (1) and ordered F to prepare a notarial deed under a monetary loan agreement with the effect that “the obligor D was determined and borrowed as of August 8, 2012 from creditor H on May 8, 2012 as the due date and time for repayment” that “the obligor D was determined and borrowed as of August 8, 2012.”

4. The Defendant exercised the original notarial deed by allowing the Defendant to keep the notarial deed as the original notarial deed, which is the original notarial deed written falsely as set forth in paragraph (1), at the time and place set forth in paragraph (3), around that time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1.The police of I.S.

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 포항지원 2014.06.18 2014고정86

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2013.11.06 2013고단2515

-서울남부지방법원 2013.01.24 2012고단3804

-인천지방법원 2013.12.04 2013고단6423

-인천지방법원 2015.01.28 2014고단7399