beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants corresponding to the amount ordered to be paid below.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. Codefendant C of the first instance trial (hereinafter referred to as “C”) through false lease contract, certificate of employment, etc., through the lending of money from a bank as a full-time loan for workers, the so-called all-time loan fraud group, the first instance trial codefendant D of the first instance trial (hereinafter referred to as “D”) conspired to acquire money by obtaining a loan from a bank by using a false lease contract, certificate of employment, etc., from a corporation issuing a false employment certificate, etc. and a false lessor. Defendant E, as an operator of the F Co., Ltd. issuing a false employment certificate, etc., and
Accordingly, C et al. interfered with the joint defendant A (hereinafter only referred to as "A") of the first instance court and the defendant B who will act as a lessor, and C, D, A, and the Defendants conspired to borrow the full-time employee loan from the bank of Korea Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Korea Bank") to obtain the full-time employee loan.
B. According to the above public offering, A applied for a loan of the former loan while submitting to the Bank the lease deposit amount of KRW 150,000,000 for the lease deposit of KRW 150,000,000 for the building G building 103, 701, Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, which was prepared with Defendant B, and the false certificate of employment prepared by E as the representative director of the F.
In addition, on August 21, 2012, Defendant B prepared a confirmation document stating that the employee in charge of our bank has entered into such a lease agreement with A.
C. On August 17, 2012, based on the aforementioned false documents, our bank entered into an agreement with A to fully lend KRW 100,000,000 on August 24, 2012 from the date of loan commencement to repay the full amount of the loan on August 24, 2012, and accordingly to lend KRW 100,00,000.
(hereinafter “instant loan”). D.
The plaintiff around August 24, 2012 is due to A and A's loan of this case.