logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.28 2014나45767
구상금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On March 209, Co-Defendant A of the first instance trial concluded a loan agreement with Co-Defendant C of the first instance trial and proposed to have a lease fund divided by false employed documents and fraudulent housing lease-related documents from Co-Defendant C of the first instance trial. At that time, C proposed to the Defendant through Co-Defendant D of the first instance trial that he would pay for the lessor’s role under the housing lease contract necessary for the loan, and the Defendant consented to the loan. C, at the time of the time of broad real estate establishment of the first instance trial, “J Real Estate Office” owned by the Defendant, “F, K P&S 400,000,000,000,000 won and 40,000,000 won and 40,000,000 won and 4,000,000 won and 4,000,000 won and 9,000,000 won and 4,000,000,000 won.

A shall provide the said bank with a credit guarantee on the same day.

arrow