A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 01:00 on March 12, 2019, the Defendant interfered with the performance of duties: (a) caused the disturbance to the victim’s d main points operated by the victim C in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, to go too much in drinking values; and (b) caused the disturbance to avoid fear of other customers, and caused the disturbance to put other customers to the said d main points.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's main business by force over about 30 minutes.

2. The Defendant, at the date, time, and place of the statement in Paragraph 1, who reported to the Defendant that “the swayF belonging to the E box called out after receiving the Defendant’s 112 report that “the drinking price was too high,” and recommended the Defendant to return home to the Defendant, the Defendant: “I would like to do so, I would like to do so, I would like to do so, and I would like to do so, but I would like to do so, I would like to do so, but the police of the Republic of Korea will do so, I would like to do so, and “I will do so by law” and “I see so, I see the f's spread in front and rear, and f's part was pushed up three times in front and rear, and f's part was sealed.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the accused and G;

1. Application of each police protocol to F and C

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendant, prior to the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, had been sentenced to a fine due to interference with business, etc., but has been under the influence of alcohol, and thus has obstructed the main business, such as taking a bath, and furthermore called out.