Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On April 15, 2015, at around 22:50, the Defendant interfered with business, at the frequency of “E” operated by the victim D in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force by force, such as: (b) having the victim D drink and drink at the frequency of “E”; and (c) having the victim request the payment of the drinking value by drinking alcohol and food; and (d) having the victim demanded the payment of the drinking value; (e) having been drinking for food; (e) having been fluenced; and (e) having been fluenced, the Defendant sing the table of the above frequency; and (e) having the victim walked with the table of the above frequency; and (e) obstructing the victim’s restaurant business
2. The Defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (collective assault, deadly weapon, etc.) stated that the victim F (the age of 15) who was the child of D, who was aware of the said horses from other customers at the above time, and at the above time and place, “I would like to calculate the drinking value of the match and why why I would see it?” The victim F (the age of 15) was said to have made the said horses. The Defendant expressed, by hand, the victim’s desire to write the victim’s head debt and knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife kn
3. When the Defendant, at the same time and place as above, received a report of 112 and received a check from H, the Defendant expressed that “the captain of the police station, who was sent to the police station, shall do so,” which read, “the captain of the police station, shall do so, in turn, do so, and do so, he did assault the H’s breath, and obstructed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the prevention and suppression of the police officer’s crime.”
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant at the court (the second trial date);
1. Statement of the police made to D, F, and H;
1. A written statement of I;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;
1. Relevant statutory provisions of Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts (a) of the same Act, Articles 3(1) and 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning obstruction of performance of official duties.