logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 수원지방법원 2010. 1. 7. 선고 2009노4919 판결
[공정증서원본불실기재·불실기재공정증서원본행사][미간행]
Escopics

Defendant

Appellant. An appellant

Defendant

Prosecutor

Kim Jong-Un

Judgment of the lower court

Suwon District Court Decision 2009 High Court Decision 2995 Decided September 30, 2009

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

The defendant went to a model test of permissible driver's license in order to have a license reissued with her children, the defendant's name is ice, a person outside of the area requests a vehicle to park immediately and submit a re-issuance application and photograph to the public official in charge, and at the time, he had known that he had submitted a sentence, not his photograph, at the time, and immediately discarded his license with the knowledge that the photograph of the driver's license was changed, so the judgment below which found the defendant guilty of all the charges of this case without the intention to commit each of the crimes of this case, by misunderstanding the facts or misunderstanding the legal principles as to intention.

2. Determination

According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the defendant prepared an application for re-issuance of driver's license as stated in the facts charged in this case and submitted it to the public official in charge. The defendant directly submitted a photo of the non-indicted, who is the defendant, not his photograph, in the photo column of the above application. The defendant had the above public official in charge attach a photograph of the non-indicted, who is the defendant, to the vehicle driving license register of the defendant, which is the original copy of the notarial deed, and used it by making the above non-indicted, keep the vehicle driving license register stating the false facts. Thus, the court below's finding the defendant guilty of the facts charged in this case is just and there is no error of law

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Lee Dong-chul (Presiding Judge)

arrow