A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with business;

A. On August 2014, at around 02:30, the Defendant found the victim D’s convenience store in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Seoul, while drinking, obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by force for approximately 30 minutes, by leaving the victim’s tobacco frighted on the floor, and putting the victim’s fright to take a bath to customers.

B. At early 01:00 on September 201, 2014, the Defendant found the victim’s convenience store as indicated in the above paragraph (a) at a drunk point, and laid a drinking-be on the floor, broken off the drinking-be, humping the bath, and obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by force for about 30 minutes, such as lying on the floor.

C. At around 23:00 on October 2014, the Defendant found the victim’s convenience points as indicated in the above paragraph (a) while drunk, thereby obstructing the victim’s convenience store business by force for about 20 minutes, such as spiting down spits on the floor and blocking the calculation of flabs on the floor, thereby obstructing the victim’s convenience store business.

On December 12, 2014, at around 14:00, the Defendant found the G convenience store in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City F under the influence of alcohol, brought alcohol to the victim H, an employee, and took a bath, and subsequently interfered with the victim’s convenience store business by force for a period of about one hour, such as taking a bath to customers.

2. On January 25, 2015, the Defendant obstruction of performance of official duties: (a) at the home of the Defendant’s Republic of Korea, Nam-gu, Incheon, Nam-gu, 102, and at the time when the Defendant, who was assaulted by internal combustion, was dispatched to the K District L of the Incheon Southern Police Station, which received the Defendant’s 112 report, “Is the death of the inside”, “Is the following le,” and “Is the desire to take a bath,” and the Defendant was unable to properly state the fact of damage under the influence of alcohol, etc., the Defendant tried to return to the said L to the district, “Is the above L, “Is off, Is off, Is off, Is off, Is off, Is off,” and “Is off the left side of the said L.”