1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the amount ordered to be paid next shall be cancelled.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff is the deceased (non-gu) of C.

B. The Defendant is working as the clinic called “L” at the Internet daily storage site (www.be.com,” hereinafter referred to as the “instant website”).

H. A notice posted comments on comments twice as follows:

1

H. Around 20:26, a notice was written by a person whose name is not known on the Internet website bulletin board of this case as “I”, and in the past, the Plaintiff written and posted a letter on his Twitter stating that “I will drive away from J, scambling before the house, scambling, and white scambling, at the risk of Habbing Habbing, at the risk of coming from K’s down.” As to the attachment of a letter “Nging that will be developed on the front day,” “Ngs must process it.”

2

H. Around 20:16, a notice was written by a person whose name is not known on the Internet site bulletin board of this case as “O” and the Plaintiff, in the past, posted a notice on his Twitter, stating that “ Qu. Qu. Qu, in Korea, the U.S. will be viewed as the U.S., and the U.S. will be required for liquor tax,” and the Plaintiff’s Twitter 12 to capture and attach the Plaintiff’s Twitter 12.”

(F) On November 22, 2013, G puts on the Plaintiff’s Twitter a letter “Asskin in a sofinus with a gresh.” (C).

On May 20, 2014, the prosecutor filed a summary order with the Seoul Southern District Court No. 2014 High Court No. 5998, and issued a summary order against the Defendant at KRW 700,000 on May 20, 2014, which became final and conclusive around that time.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap 1 through 5, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts, the defendant can confirm the contents of this article by accessing many unspecified persons.