1. The period for prohibition of departure of the Defendant against the Plaintiff on October 26, 2016, upon request for exchange change in the trial.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance regarding this case is as follows: (a) from the date of the first instance judgment’s “Disposition No. 7 under the Table No. 3,” to the date the Disposition No. 8 under the Table No. 8, “the Disposition” was taken; and (b) again, on October 26, 2016, the period of prohibition of departure was extended to April 30, 2017 (hereinafter “the Disposition No. 1, No. 9”; (c) the Disposition No. 9 under the Table No. 4, to the effect that the Disposition No. 1, “No. 2, 2013,” was revoked by the court of first instance with the grounds for the alteration of the Disposition No. 1, No. 2, 2016, and the Disposition No. 1, No. 2, 2015,” and “No. 1, No. 2, 2016,” to the effect that the Disposition No. 4, upon the first Disposition, was revoked. 2,

It is so decided as per Disposition.